The authors of E.O. pointed out that there are no bad teams, only which of the following?

The authors of E.O. pointed out that there are no bad teams, only which of the following?

• A. No bad teams, only bad leaders
• B. No team is hopeless
• C. Poor communication
• D. Bad luck

Answer: (A)

This item tests the idea that leadership determines how a team performs. The notion that there are no bad teams, only bad leaders means that if a leader provides clear direction, builds trust, communicates well, sets expectations, and removes obstacles, the team can succeed even when other factors are less than ideal. Strong leadership aligns the team, drives accountability, and supports members to execute effectively. When leadership is weak—goals are unclear, feedback is poor, or obstacles aren’t addressed—the team’s performance suffers, which is why the issue is framed around leadership rather than the team itself. The other options point to symptoms or external factors (hopelessness, poor communication, bad luck) but they don’t capture the central driver highlighted here: leadership.

This item tests the idea that leadership determines how a team performs. The notion that there are no bad teams, only bad leaders means that if a leader provides clear direction, builds trust, communicates well, sets expectations, and removes obstacles, the team can succeed even when other factors are less than ideal. Strong leadership aligns the team, drives accountability, and supports members to execute effectively. When leadership is weak—goals are unclear, feedback is poor, or obstacles aren’t addressed—the team’s performance suffers, which is why the issue is framed around leadership rather than the team itself. The other options point to symptoms or external factors (hopelessness, poor communication, bad luck) but they don’t capture the central driver highlighted here: leadership.